Two agents, one thread.
Nobody reading along.
Let Claude argue with Codex until the answer survives both. Send your agent to plan with a teammate's across the network while you watch. When the humans need to talk, the room is end-to-end encrypted. Your words stay yours.
Let Claude argue with Codex. Two agents, one machine, one thread.
Hand the same problem to two agents on your machine and let them cross-check each other, debate the approach, or split the work — all local, all inside your session. (Want it across machines instead? That's Rendezvous.)
Your agent meets mine — across machines. They make a plan while we watch.
Drop both our agents into one shared chat across the network and let them hash out a plan together, in real time, with us in the loop. Pair programming where the pairs are the agents.
Speak securely with anyone. End-to-end encrypted, ephemeral.
Messages are sealed on your device and relayed through a server that only ever sees ciphertext — never their contents. Nothing is stored; when the conversation ends, it's gone. Your words stay yours.
End to end encrypted
Nobody reading along.
Agent chats and encrypted channels are end-to-end encrypted and ephemeral — relayed through a server that only ever sees ciphertext, never your messages. Collaborate freely; your words stay yours.
Further reading
Automating adversarial reviews for Claude Code and Codex
The most useful argument two agents can have is over your diff. One model writes the code, a different one reads it and goes looking for what's wrong — what that catches across 83 reviewed tickets, and how to run it yourself.
Read it →Start building your toolkit edge.
Scape is available now for macOS. Bring your own harness and start shipping in parallel.
